Burglary of a Structure in Florida

If accused of Burglary of a Structure in Florida, you need to know the:

Definition of Burglary of a Structure

The crime of Burglary of a Structure can be committed in one of two ways:

  1. Unlawfully entering a structure with the intent to commit a crime inside; or
  2. Lawfully entering a structure, but then remaining inside the structure either:
    1. Surreptitiously, with the intent to commit a crime;
    2. After permission to remain has been withdrawn, with the intent to commit a crime inside; or
    3. With the intent to commit a forcible felony.

A structure is defined as a building of any kind, either temporary or permanent, which has a roof over it, together with the surrounding curtilage.

Penalties for Burglary of a Structure

The penalties for the crime of Burglary of a Structure depend on whether you are charged with:

Burglary of an Occupied Structure

The crime of Burglary of an Occupied Structure in Florida is classified as a Second Degree Felony and is assigned a Level 6 offense severity ranking under Florida's Criminal Punishment Code.

If convicted of Burglary of an Occupied Structure, a judge can impose any combination of the following penalties:

  • Up to fifteen (15) years in prison.
  • Up to fifteen (15) years of probation.
  • Up to $10,000 in fines.

Burglary of an Unoccupied Structure

The crime of Burglary of an Unoccupied Structure is classified as a Third Degree Felony and is assigned a Level 4 offense severity ranking under Florida's Criminal Punishment Code.

If convicted of Burglary of an Unoccupied Structure, a judge can impose any combination of the following penalties:

  • Up to five (5) years in prison.
  • Up to five (5) years of probation.
  • Up to $5,000 in fines.

Defenses to Burglary of a Structure

In addition to the pretrial and trial defenses that can be raised in any criminal case, specific defenses to the crime of Burglary of a Structure include:

Consent

Consent to enter is not an element of Burglary of a Structure, but is an affirmative defense to the crime. A defendant has the burden to offer evidence of consent. But once evidence of consent is presented, the prosecutor must disprove the consent to enter the structure beyond a reasonable doubt. [1]

Consent is usually raised when there are multiple people who exercise control over a structure, one of whom gave you consent to enter. Under that circumstance you cannot be convicted of burglary of a structure just because the other people were unaware of your authorization to enter the structure.

Open to the Public

If an establishment is "open to the public" a person by definition has consensually entered, no matter what the subjective intentions for entering were. As a result, the right to "remain inside" is implied unless the State has proof that the implied consent to "remain inside" was withdrawn. So if you commit a crime inside (such as theft or robbery) you cannot also be convicted of Burglary of a Structure. [2]

Off Limits or Employee Only Area

The "Open to the Public" defense does not apply to an off limits or employee only area of a business and a Burglary of a Structure conviction will be upheld if such an area is entered. [3]

Lack of Intent to Commit a Crime

One of the elements necessary to support a conviction for Burglary of a Structure is the intent to commit a crime inside the structure. Usually this is proven by showing that a person entered the structure stealthily. [4]

However, if a person shows lawful reasons for entering the structure, such as to get out of the rain or to find a place to sleep, a person cannot be convicted of Burglary of a Structure (although a conviction for Trespass to a Structure may be proper).

Contact Criminal Defense Lawyer Richard Hornsby

If you have been arrested or charged with the crime of Burglary of a Structure in Central Florida or the greater Orlando area, please contact Criminal Defense Lawyer today.

The initial consultation is free and I am always available to advise you of the proper course of action that can be taken.

References

  1. D.R. v. State, 734 So. 2d 455 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)
  2. Miller v. State, 713 So. 2d 1008 (Fla. 1998)
  3. Thomas v. State, 742 So. 2d 326 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)
  4. K.H. v. State, 620 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)